Daily Express, May 11, 2018
If you are going to use a stock phrase (which is one step down from a cliche), at least get it right. You can ‘call time’ or you can ‘blow the final whistle’. I’m afraid that ‘blowing time’ has unfortunate connotations which are unsuitable for a family website.
The Times, May 12, 2018
This caption says: The Duke of Edinburgh, 96, was seen in public with the Queen for the first time since his hip operation last month at the 75th Royal Windsor Horse Show (29 words)
It reads as if the duke had his operation at the horse show. You could get round this by doing it thus:
In his first public appearance since his hip operation last month, the Duke of Edinburgh, 96, visited the 75th Royal Windsor Horse show with the Queen yesterday (27 words)
which gets in ‘yesterday’.
The same problem often occurs with court reports, for example: ‘Smith was jailed for five years at Blackfriars Crown Court.’ Just turn it round: ‘At Blackfriars Crown Court, Smith was jailed for five years.’
Daily Express, May 7, 2018
‘Bonanza’ means a large amount of something good, for example ‘a bonanza year for kale growers’. It cannot possibly apply to a lot of blisters, except perhaps for the sticking plaster industry.
Daily Express, May 7, 2018
If you have joint third in a ranking list, those two count as third and fourth places, so the next one is fifth.
The Times, May 4, 2018
Here is another intro where the word ‘but’ has been completely misunderstood. It means that something unexpected follows. The intro just won’t work in this form. You could try something like this:
After the installation of 15,000 panes of glass and the assembly of 69,000 components, the Temperate House at Kew reopened last night.
or this:
After a five-year restoration costing £42million, the Temperate House . . .
I would say ‘conservation architects Donald Insall Associates, who will oversee . . .’ not ‘which’. It is a group of people, not things.
In the context of Kew, a ‘biomass plant’ sounds like one of the residents, not machinery. To make it clear it should say a ‘biomass power plant’. And what is ‘cathodic protection’? I would bet good money the sub didn’t know. I looked it up and it is very technical. If you don’t know what something is, or can’t explain it, leave it out.
BBC News Online, May 3, 2018
‘Actor’ is being used more and more instead of the traditional ‘actress’, and a lot of people detest it. So do some performers, but many others prefer it. This article from The Stage gives both points of view (warning of bad language):
https://www.thestage.co.uk/opinion/2017/mark-shenton-actor-actress/
I would always use ‘actress’ – in fact, is it not ‘patriarchal’ to opt for the masculine version? Why not call both men and women ‘actresses’? – but you need to make your own decision.
i newspaper, May 2, 2018
Given the choice, would you put ‘singer’ or ‘George Michael’ in the heading?
This is what I would have done:
George Michael shrines to be taken down
‘The late George Michael’? Would you put the story in the paper if you thought readers did not know he was dead? You need ‘late’ only when someone has recently died, and there is a possibility that not everyone knows, as in ‘The seat was held by the late Fred Smith’, or when the people in a story are not well known, as in ‘Mr Brown took over the farm from his late father’.
Three quotation marks is excessive.
‘Up until’ is ignorant. You could say ‘until’ or ‘up to’.
The Times, April 26, 2018
My scanner could not cope with the whole article, but the caption is self-explanatory. This is an error of editorial judgment rather than subbing – how can you possibly suggest that certain artworks are copied or derived from others without showing the originals? Done this way, it is pointless.
The Times, April 26, 2018
A headline must be an accurate reflection of the story, but there is no mention of loans here. Indeed the expression ‘had given modest sums’ sounds like gifts. In fact it seems from other sources that Ms Bulford mentioned ‘loans and advances’. I presume that has been cut. You can’t write a headline on what you imagine to be there.
Daily Express, April 23, 2018
It used to be considered correct to put ‘an’ before a word beginning with ‘h’ in which the second syllable was stressed, as in ‘horrific’ and ‘horrendous’. These days it looks precious. Don’t use ‘an’ before ‘hotel’ either. The only time to use ‘an’ before a word beginning with ‘h’ is when the ‘h’ is silent, as in ‘honour’ or ‘hour’.
It would have been nice to have a full point at the end of the third par, but perhaps it was too much trouble.
The Times, April 21, 2018
‘Relish’ is a transitive verb, which means it must have an object, in the same way as ‘like’ or ‘enjoy’. You couldn’t put ‘She liked that some members would be upset’. The sentence could be ‘She relished the prospect that some members would be upset’ or ‘She relished the fact that . . .’
An intransitive verb does not have an object. Examples include ‘sneeze’ and ‘die’.