i newspaper, March 3, 2020 (I think – forgot to note the exact date)

(51 words) I keep saying that shorts are the finest form of subbing. Any clot can tick up 500 words but boiling that down to 50 is an art.

This effort, with its literal and its repetition and its gibberish, is pathetic. How was the shirt recovered? Who wore it? Never mind the replica value, what is the stolen one worth? What is the design that is so terrible?

Obviously this should have been schemed with a picture, as should any story which involves the appearance of something. You can see it here.




Even so, this is how it could be done:

A rare Celtic shirt stolen from the National Football Museum in Manchester last weekend has been posted back anonymously. The Number 10 shirt was worn by Charlie Nicholas in the 1991/2 season and valued at £600. Last year the jagged lightning design featured in ‘the 20 worst ever strips’.

As for the heading, why would anyone say ‘restored’ rather than ‘returned’? I would suggest:


‘Worst’ football shirt
is sent off by thief

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.